Sevenoaks District Council
Brownfield land
| name | reference | site-address | deliverable | hazardous-substances | hectares | MinNetDwellings | minimum-net-dwellings | maximum-net-dwellings | ownership-status | planning-permission-date | planning-permission-type | planning-permission-history | planning-permission-status | site-plan-url | point | notes | OrganisationLabel | organisation | entry-date | start-date | end-date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BFR154 | BFR154 | Former West Kent Cold Store, Rye Lane, Dunton Green | yes | 0.35 | 35 | 35 | not owned by a public authority | 2018-05-03 | full planning permission | permissioned | https://pa.sevenoaks.gov.uk/online-applications/ | POINT(0.171259 51.293674) | Erection of 35 apartments, including the provision of affordable homes, together with access, parking and landscaping. | 2019-02-01 | 2019-02-01 | ||||||
| BFR155 | BFR155 | St Johns Ambulance Brigade, Chatham Hill Road, Sevenoaks | yes | 0.09 | 8 | 8 | not owned by a public authority | 2017-04-27 | full planning permission | permissioned | https://pa.sevenoaks.gov.uk/online-applications/ | POINT(0.193577 51.288992) | Demolition of existing buildings; erection of 8no. residential apartments and associated works including car parking, cycle and refuse stores and landscaping scheme | 2019-02-01 | 2019-02-01 | ||||||
| BFR158 | BFR158 | Land south of Orchard House, Ash Road, Hartley | yes | 0.25 | 10 | 10 | not owned by a public authority | Not Permissioned | https://www.sevenoaks.gov.uk/downloads/file/1926/sup017a_site_appraisals_-_sites_included_in_the_local_plan | POINT(0.303727 51.377488) | 2019-07-01 | 2019-07-01 | |||||||||
| BFR01 | BFR01 | 0 | 0 | not owned by a public authority | other | permissioned | http://cds.sevenoaks.gov.uk/mgAi.aspx?ID=8418 | POINT(0.171234 51.293685) | Located within Sevenoaks urban confines the site is considered sustainable. No physical or environmental constraints. However the site currently benefits from an extant planning permission for 2,300sqm of B1(a) office floorspace and a 460sqm medical facility, as part of a wider mixed use redevelopment scheme of the old West Kent Cold Store which sought to retain an element of employment floorspace. | 2017-12-01 | 2017-11-01 | ||||||||||
| BFR02 | BFR02 | yes | 0.03 | 4 | 5 | not owned by a public authority | Not Permissioned | http://cds.sevenoaks.gov.uk/mgAi.aspx?ID=8419 | POINT(0.058569 51.201715) | Located within Edenbridge urban confines the site is considered sustainable. There is scope for expanding the retail element on the ground floor and providing flats above. Given the small scale nature of the site and its close proximity to existing residential units there are some concerns over amenity impacts which could be addressed through high quality design. | 2017-12-01 | 2017-11-01 | |||||||||
| BFR03 | BFR03 | 0 | 0 | not owned by a public authority | Not Permissioned | http://cds.sevenoaks.gov.uk/mgAi.aspx?ID=8420 | POINT(0.251733 51.403538) | Located within South Darenth urban confines the site is considered sustainable. A new access could be made onto Shrubbery Road. The majority of the site is currently allocated as open space. | 2017-12-01 | 2017-11-01 | |||||||||||
| BFR04 | BFR04 | yes | 0.6 | 18 | 24 | not owned by a public authority | Not Permissioned | http://cds.sevenoaks.gov.uk/mgAi.aspx?ID=8421 | POINT(0.250873 51.349432) | Located mainly within West Kingsdown urban confines the site is considered sustainable. There is existing access onto the A20 however this is very narrow and in a poor state of repair and would require improving. The developable area of the site is reduced to take account of the ancient woodland and any buffer requirement. Overall the site is considered able to accommodate development. | 2017-12-01 | 2017-11-01 | |||||||||
| BFR05 | BFR05 | yes | 0.4 | 12 | 16 | not owned by a public authority | Not Permissioned | http://cds.sevenoaks.gov.uk/mgAi.aspx?ID=8422 | POINT(0.254217 51.347632) | Located within West Kingsdown urban confines the site is considered sustainable. The existing access onto London Road could be utilised. The site is considered suitable for redevelopment. | 2017-12-01 | 2017-11-01 | |||||||||
| BFR06 | BFR06 | yes | 0.4 | 12 | 16 | not owned by a public authority | Not Permissioned | http://cds.sevenoaks.gov.uk/mgAi.aspx?ID=8423 | POINT(0.175051 51.409276) | Partially located within Hextable urban confines the site is considered sustainable. The existing access onto Crawfords could be utilised. Hextable Gardens is a designated registered park and garden and is not suitable for development. Overall the eastern portion of the site is considered able to accommodate development, subject to the retention or reprovision of the community floorspace. | 2017-12-01 | 2017-11-01 | |||||||||
| BFR07 | BFR07 | yes | 2.5 | 75 | 100 | not owned by a public authority | Not Permissioned | http://cds.sevenoaks.gov.uk/mgAi.aspx?ID=8424 | POINT(0.183216 51.414053) | Located within Hextable urban confines the site is considered sustainable. The existing access onto Rowhill Road could be utilised. The southern portion of the site containing the school playing fields is allocated as open space. This area is an important part of the green infrastructure network and the loss of this use is not supported and would need to be clearly demonstrated. Overall the northern portion of the site is considered able to accommodate development. | 2017-12-01 | 2017-11-01 | |||||||||
| BFR09 | BFR09 | yes | 0.28 | 8 | 11 | not owned by a public authority | Not Permissioned | http://cds.sevenoaks.gov.uk/mgAi.aspx?ID=8426 | POINT(0.190336 51.23543) | Located within Sevenoaks Weald urban confines the site is considered sustainable. The site lies within the AONB. The existing access onto Mount Pleasant Road could be utilised. A small part of the site is identified in the Open Spaces Study as amenity green space which forms an important part of the green infrastructure network. The loss of this use is not supported and would need to be clearly demonstrated. Given the small scale nature of the site and its close proximity to existing residential units there are some concerns over amenity impacts which could be addressed through high quality design. Overall the site is considered able to accommodate development. | 2017-12-01 | 2017-11-01 | |||||||||
| BFR10 | BFR10 | yes | 0.39 | 11 | 15 | not owned by a public authority | Not Permissioned | http://cds.sevenoaks.gov.uk/mgAi.aspx?ID=8427 | POINT(0.19156 51.234967) | Partially located within Sevenoaks Weald urban confines the site is considered sustainable. The site lies within the AONB but is considered to be well contained within the landscape. A new access onto Mount Pleasant Road would be required. Overall the site is considered able to accommodate development however it is partially located within the Green Belt so this designation would need to change in order for it to be developed. | 2017-12-01 | 2017-11-01 | |||||||||
| BFR11 | BFR11 | 0 | 0 | not owned by a public authority | Not Permissioned | http://cds.sevenoaks.gov.uk/mgAi.aspx?ID=8428 | POINT(0.181491 51.273737) | Located within Sevenoaks urban confines the site is considered sustainable. No physical or environmental constraints. However the site is currently allocated for employment (office) use. The loss of this use is not supported and would need to be clearly demonstrated. | 2017-12-01 | 2017-11-01 | |||||||||||
| BFR18 | BFR18 | yes | 1.82 | not owned by a public authority | Not Permissioned | http://cds.sevenoaks.gov.uk/mgAi.aspx?ID=8436 | POINT(0.1437 51.280262) | Employment: The site is isolated and not connected to a settlement. The existing access onto Dryhill Lane could be utilised. Given its location and proximity to the highway network it is considered that the site is best suited to employment use, and redevelopment could contribute to improving the character of the AONB. Overall the site is considered able to accommodate employment development however it is located within the Green Belt so this designation would need to change in order for it to be developed. | 2017-12-01 | 2017-11-01 | |||||||||||
| BFR21 | BFR21 | yes | 0.3 | 9 | 12 | not owned by a public authority | Not Permissioned | http://cds.sevenoaks.gov.uk/mgAi.aspx?ID=8440 | POINT(0.155298 51.324917) | The site is not connected to a settlement but is within walking distance of Badgers Mount where there are good transport links. There is existing access onto London Road which could be utilised. The site lies within the AONB however it is considered that redevelopment of the site could contribute towards improving the character or the area. Overall the site is considered able to accommodate development, however it is located within the Green Belt so this designation would need to change in order for it to be developed. | 2017-12-01 | 2017-11-01 | |||||||||
| BFR22 | BFR22 | yes | 0.65 | 19 | 26 | not owned by a public authority | Not Permissioned | http://cds.sevenoaks.gov.uk/mgAi.aspx?ID=8441 | POINT(0.156538 51.324427) | The site is not connected to a settlement but is within walking distance of Badgers Mount where there are good transport links. There is existing access onto London Road which could be utilised. The site lies within the AONB however redevelopment of the site could contribute towards improving the character of the area. The presence of ancient woodland would require protection and a buffer between the woodland and any future development. Overall the site is considered able to accommodate development, subject to the retention or reprovision of the employment floorspace, however it is located within the Green Belt so this designation would need to change in order for it to be developed. | 2017-12-01 | 2017-11-01 | |||||||||
| BFR24 | BFR24 | yes | 0.51 | 15 | 20 | not owned by a public authority | Not Permissioned | http://cds.sevenoaks.gov.uk/mgAi.aspx?ID=8443 | POINT(0.302852 51.378145) | The site is not connected to a settlement but is within walking distance of Hartley. The proposed access onto Ash Road differs to the existing access and would require improvement. There are long uninterrupted views from the site to the west. Overall the site is considered able to accommodate development, however it is located within the Green Belt so this designation would need to change in order for it to be developed. | 2017-12-01 | 2017-11-01 | |||||||||
| BFR25 | BFR25 | yes | 0.38 | 11 | 15 | not owned by a public authority | Not Permissioned | http://cds.sevenoaks.gov.uk/mgAi.aspx?ID=8444 | POINT(0.23396 51.298737) | The site is located within the built confines of Noah’s Ark, although this settlement does not have a boundary and is washed over by the Green Belt. The existing access onto Noah’s Ark could be utilised. The site lies within the AONB however redevelopment of the site could contribute towards improving the character. Overall the site is considered able to accommodate development, subject to the retention or reprovision of the employment floorspace, however it is located within the Green Belt so this designation would need to change in order for it to be developed. | 2017-12-01 | 2017-11-01 | |||||||||
| BFR26 | BFR26 | yes | 0.21 | 6 | 8 | not owned by a public authority | Not Permissioned | http://cds.sevenoaks.gov.uk/mgAi.aspx?ID=8445 | POINT(0.172112 51.197683) | The site is located within the built confines of Chiddingstone Causeway, although this settlement does not have a boundary and is washed over by the Green Belt. There is existing access onto Tonbridge Road which could be utilised. Consideration should be given to any potential noise impact from the railway line. Overall the site is considered able to accommodate development, however it is located within the Green Belt so this designation would need to change in order for it to be developed. | 2017-12-01 | 2017-11-01 | |||||||||
| BFR27 | BFR27 | yes | 0.26 | 7 | 11 | not owned by a public authority | Not Permissioned | http://cds.sevenoaks.gov.uk/mgAi.aspx?ID=8446 | POINT(0.168462 51.198902) | SOME EMPLOYMENT: The site is located at the edge of the built confines of Chiddingstone Causeway, although this settlement does not have a boundary and is washed over by the Green Belt. There is existing access onto Tonbridge Road which could be utilised. The office building has recently been refurbished and is in use and provides important rural office accommodation therefore should be retained. Overall the site is considered able to accommodate a mixed use development however it is located within the Green Belt so this designation would need to change in order for it to be developed. | 2017-12-01 | 2017-11-01 | |||||||||
| BFR28 | BFR28 | yes | 0.86 | not owned by a public authority | Not Permissioned | http://cds.sevenoaks.gov.uk/mgAi.aspx?ID=8447 | POINT(0.172035 51.196956) | Employment: The site is located at the edge of the built confines of Chiddingstone Causeway, although this settlement does not have a boundary and is washed over by the Green Belt. There is existing access onto Station Hill which could be utilised. Consideration should be given to any potential noise impact from the railway line. Given the rural location and existing use of the site, the employment use should be retained and intensified. Overall the site is considered able to accommodate additional employment development, however it is located within the Green Belt so this designation would need to change in order for it to be developed. | 2017-12-01 | 2017-11-01 | |||||||||||
| BFR29 | BFR29 | yes | 1.24 | not owned by a public authority | Not Permissioned | http://cds.sevenoaks.gov.uk/mgAi.aspx?ID=8448 | POINT(0.19271 51.300381) | The site is located adjacent to Sevenoaks urban confines. There is existing access onto Old Otford Road which could be utilised if improved. Overall the site is considered able to accommodate development, and is most suited to employment development given the adjacent uses, however it is located within the Green Belt so this designation would need to change in order for it to be developed. | 2017-12-01 | 2017-11-01 | |||||||||||
| BFR30 | BFR30 | yes | 0.58 | 17 | 23 | not owned by a public authority | Not Permissioned | http://cds.sevenoaks.gov.uk/mgAi.aspx?ID=8449 | POINT(0.200451 51.236347) | The site is not connected to a settlement but is within walking distance of Sevenoaks Weald. There is existing access onto Morleys Road which could be utilised. Consideration should be given to any potential noise impact from the railway line. The site lies within the AONB however redevelopment of the site could contribute towards improving the character. Overall the site is considered able to accommodate development, however it is located within the Green Belt so this designation would need to change in order for it to be developed. | 2017-12-01 | 2017-11-01 | |||||||||
| BFR33 | BFR33 | yes | 0.55 | 16 | 22 | not owned by a public authority | Not Permissioned | http://cds.sevenoaks.gov.uk/mgAi.aspx?ID=8453 | POINT(0.168571 51.406959) | Some employment: The site is isolated and not connected to a settlement. The existing access onto Leydenhatch Lane could be utilised. The business centre is fully let and provides important office accommodation for small businesses therefore should be retained. Overall the site is considered able to accommodate a mixed use development however it is located within the Green Belt so this designation would need to change in order for it to be developed. | 2017-12-01 | 2017-11-01 | |||||||||
| BFR34 | BFR34 | 0 | 0 | not owned by a public authority | Not Permissioned | http://cds.sevenoaks.gov.uk/mgAi.aspx?ID=8454 | POINT(0.065074 51.263914) | The site is located adjacent to Westerham urban confines. The two existing access points onto the A25 could be utilised. The site lies within the AONB but is considered to be well contained within the landscape. The site lies wholly within flood zones 2 and 3 and any development proposal would be subject to a flood risk assessment. The site also lies within the Conservation Area and is adjacent to a number of listed buildings, and concerns are raised over any impact a redevelopment would have. Overall the site is considered unsuitable for development given the flooding and heritage issues. | 2017-12-01 | 2017-11-01 | |||||||||||
| BFR35 | BFR35 | yes | 0.65 | 19 | 26 | not owned by a public authority | Not Permissioned | http://cds.sevenoaks.gov.uk/mgAi.aspx?ID=8455 | POINT(0.106937 51.281595) | The site is not connected to a settlement but is within walking distance of the facilities and services in Brasted. The existing access onto Coles Lane could be utilised for a small number of units. It is considered that development of the whole site would not conserve or enhance the AONB. Overall the previously developed portion of the site is considered able to accommodate development however it is located within the Green Belt so this designation would need to change in order for it to be developed. | 2017-12-01 | 2017-11-01 | |||||||||
| BFR36 | BFR36 | yes | 0.5 | 15 | 20 | not owned by a public authority | Not Permissioned | http://cds.sevenoaks.gov.uk/mgAi.aspx?ID=8456 | POINT(0.145911 51.289242) | The site is not connected to a settlement but is within walking distance of the facilities and services in Chipstead. The existing access onto Chevening Road could be utilised. The site lies within the AONB but is considered to be well contained. Overall the part of the site fronting Chevening Road is considered able to accommodate development however it is located within the Green Belt so this designation would need to change in order for it to be developed. | 2017-12-01 | 2017-11-01 | |||||||||
| BFR37 | BFR37 | yes | 0.68 | 20 | 27 | not owned by a public authority | Not Permissioned | http://cds.sevenoaks.gov.uk/mgAi.aspx?ID=8457 | POINT(0.102319 51.274367) | The site is located adjacent to Brasted urban confines. The existing access onto the High Street could be utilised if improved. The site lies within the AONB but is considered to be well contained. Overall the site is considered able to accommodate development however it is located within the Green Belt so this designation would need to change in order for it to be developed. | 2017-12-01 | 2017-11-01 | |||||||||
| BFR38 | BFR38 | 0 | 0 | not owned by a public authority | Not Permissioned | http://cds.sevenoaks.gov.uk/mgAi.aspx?ID=8458 | POINT(0.121088 51.278732) | The site is located adjacent to Sundridge urban confines. The existing access onto the A25 could be utilised. The site lies within the AONB but is considered to be well contained within the landscape. The site lies wholly within flood zones 2 and 3 and any development proposal would be subject to a flood risk assessment. In addition the site lies within a conservation area and Coombe Bank registered park and garden. Overall the site is considered unsuitable for this scale of development given the significant heritage constraints. | 2017-12-01 | 2017-11-01 | |||||||||||
| BFR39 | BFR39 | yes | 1.8 | not owned by a public authority | Not Permissioned | http://cds.sevenoaks.gov.uk/mgAi.aspx?ID=8459 | POINT(0.141513 51.279178) | The site is isolated and not connected to a settlement. The existing access onto Dryhill Lane could be utilised. Given its rural location, proximity to the highway network and adjacent uses it is considered that the site is best suited to employment use, and redevelopment could contribute to improving the character of the AONB. Overall the previously developed part of the site is considered able to accommodate employment development however it is located within the Green Belt so this designation would need to change in order for it to be developed. | 2017-12-01 | 2017-11-01 | |||||||||||
| BFR40 | BFR40 | 0 | 0 | not owned by a public authority | Not Permissioned | http://cds.sevenoaks.gov.uk/mgAi.aspx?ID=8460 | POINT(0.162807 51.391157) | The site is not connected to a settlement but is within walking distance of the facilities and services in Crockenhill. The site is identified in the Open Spaces Study as an outdoor sports facility which forms an important part of the green infrastructure network. The loss of this use is not supported and would need to be clearly demonstrated. | 2017-12-01 | 2017-11-01 | |||||||||||
| BFR41 | BFR41 | yes | 1 | 30 | 40 | not owned by a public authority | Not Permissioned | http://cds.sevenoaks.gov.uk/mgAi.aspx?ID=8461 | POINT(0.155489 51.382245) | The site is located adjacent to Crockenhill urban confines and benefits from two points of access onto Cray Road. The western access could be utilised if improved. Concerns are raised over any impact a redevelopment would have on the setting of the listed buildings. Overall the eastern half of the site is considered able to accommodate development however it is located within the Green Belt so this designation would need to change in order for it to be developed. | 2017-12-01 | 2017-11-01 | |||||||||
| BFR42 | BFR42 | yes | 0.41 | 12 | 16 | not owned by a public authority | Not Permissioned | http://cds.sevenoaks.gov.uk/mgAi.aspx?ID=8462 | POINT(0.160695 51.301705) | The site is not connected to a settlement but is within walking distance of the services and facilities in Dunton Green. The existing access onto London Road could be utilised. The site lies within the AONB but is considered to be well contained. Concerns are raised over any impact development of this site would have on the setting of the adjacent listed building. Overall the site is considered able to accommodate development, however it is located within the Green Belt so this designation would need to change in order for it to be developed. | 2017-12-01 | 2017-11-01 | |||||||||
| BFR43 | BFR43 | yes | 0.2 | 6 | 8 | not owned by a public authority | Not Permissioned | http://cds.sevenoaks.gov.uk/mgAi.aspx?ID=8463 | POINT(0.067501 51.187644) | The site is located adjacent to Edenbridge urban confines. The existing access onto Mill Hill could be utilised. A small part of the site lies within the flood zone therefore the developable area has been reduced to reflect this. Concerns are raised over any impact the development of this site may have on the setting of the adjacent conservation area. Overall the site is considered able to accommodate development however it is located within the Green Belt so this designation would need to change in order for it to be developed. | 2017-12-01 | 2017-11-01 | |||||||||
| BFR44 | BFR44 | yes | 0.35 | 10 | 14 | not owned by a public authority | Not Permissioned | http://cds.sevenoaks.gov.uk/mgAi.aspx?ID=8464 | POINT(0.214791 51.371038) | Partially located within Eynsford urban confines the site is considered sustainable. The existing access onto the High Street could be utilised. A small part of the site lies within the flood zone therefore the developable area has been reduced to reflect this. The site also lies within the AONB but is considered to be well contained within the landscape. Concerns are raised over any impact the development of this site may have on the setting of the adjacent conservation area and listed building. Overall the site is considered able to accommodate development however it is located within the Green Belt so this designation would need to change in order for it to be developed. | 2017-12-01 | 2017-11-01 | |||||||||
| BFR45 | BFR45 | yes | 0.6 | 18 | 24 | not owned by a public authority | Not Permissioned | http://cds.sevenoaks.gov.uk/mgAi.aspx?ID=8465 | POINT(0.239276 51.370762) | The site is isolated and not connected to a settlement. The existing access onto Gorse Hill could be utilised if improved. It is considered that development of the whole site would not conserve or enhance the AONB. Overall the previously developed portion of the site is considered able to accommodate development however it is located within the Green Belt so this designation would need to change in order for it to be developed. | 2017-12-01 | 2017-11-01 | |||||||||
| BFR46 | BFR46 | yes | 1.5 | 45 | 60 | not owned by a public authority | Not Permissioned | http://cds.sevenoaks.gov.uk/mgAi.aspx?ID=8466 | POINT(0.248069 51.389533) | The site is located adjacent to Horton Kirby urban confines. The existing access onto Lombard Street could be utilised. Redevelopment of this site could contribute to improving the character of the area. Overall the previously developed part of the site is considered able to accommodate development however it is located within the Green Belt so this designation would need to change in order for it to be developed. | 2017-12-01 | 2017-11-01 | |||||||||
| BFR47 | BFR47 | yes | 0.83 | 24 | 33 | not owned by a public authority | Not Permissioned | http://cds.sevenoaks.gov.uk/mgAi.aspx?ID=8467 | POINT(0.295693 51.396758) | The site is not connected to a settlement but is within walking distance of the services and facilities in Longfield. The existing access onto Fawkham Road could be utilised. The presence of ancient woodland would require protection and a buffer between the woodland and any future development. Overall the site is considered able to accommodate development however it is located within the Green Belt so this designation would need to change in order for it to be developed. | 2017-12-01 | 2017-11-01 | |||||||||
| BFR48 | BFR48 | yes | 0.2 | 6 | 8 | not owned by a public authority | Not Permissioned | http://cds.sevenoaks.gov.uk/mgAi.aspx?ID=8468 | POINT(0.289327 51.376665) | The site is isolated and not connected to a settlement. There is existing access onto Manor Lane however this is a narrow rural lane. The site is almost entirely designated as ancient woodland which would require protection and a buffer between the woodland and any future development. Overall the previously developed portion of the site is considered able to accommodate development, subject to the ancient woodland being protected, however it is located within the Green Belt so this designation would need to change in order for it to be developed. | 2017-12-01 | 2017-11-01 | |||||||||
| BFR49 | BFR49 | yes | 0.39 | 11 | 15 | not owned by a public authority | Not Permissioned | http://cds.sevenoaks.gov.uk/mgAi.aspx?ID=8469 | POINT(0.264944 51.340042) | The site is located adjacent to West Kingsdown urban confines. The existing access onto the A20 could be utilised. Overall the site is considered able to accommodate development however it is located within the Green Belt so this designation would need to change in order for it to be developed. | 2017-12-01 | 2017-11-01 | |||||||||
| BFR50 | BFR50 | yes | 1.66 | 49 | 66 | not owned by a public authority | Not Permissioned | http://cds.sevenoaks.gov.uk/mgAi.aspx?ID=8470 | POINT(0.272089 51.338474) | The site is located adjacent to West Kingsdown urban confines. The existing access onto the A20 could be utilised. Overall the site is considered able to accommodate development however it is located within the Green Belt so this designation would need to change in order for it to be developed. | 2017-12-01 | 2017-11-01 | |||||||||
| BFR51 | BFR51 | yes | 0.53 | 15 | 21 | not owned by a public authority | Not Permissioned | http://cds.sevenoaks.gov.uk/mgAi.aspx?ID=8471 | POINT(0.273335 51.337847) | The site is located adjacent to West Kingsdown urban confines when considered alongside site HO77. The existing access onto the A20 could be utilised. Concerns are raised over potential noise and air quality issues from the M20 motorway. Overall the site is considered able to accommodate development however it is located within the Green Belt so this designation would need to change in order for it to be developed. | 2017-12-01 | 2017-11-01 | |||||||||
| BFR52 | BFR52 | 0 | 0 | not owned by a public authority | Not Permissioned | http://cds.sevenoaks.gov.uk/mgAi.aspx?ID=8472 | POINT(0.296214 51.382187) | The site is isolated and not connected to a settlement. Although it is located close to the urban confines of Hartley, the existing access is onto Valley Road to the west and it is not possible to see how the site could be integrated into Hartley. The site is identified in the Open Spaces Study as an outdoor sports facility which forms an important part of the green infrastructure network. The loss of this use is not supported and would need to be clearly demonstrated. Overall the site is considered unsuitable for this scale of development given its rural location, encroachment into the countryside, and loss of sports facilities. | 2017-12-01 | 2017-11-01 | |||||||||||
| BFR53 | BFR53 | yes | 0.15 | 4 | 6 | not owned by a public authority | Not Permissioned | http://cds.sevenoaks.gov.uk/mgAi.aspx?ID=8473 | POINT(0.24667 51.350403) | The site is isolated and not connected to a settlement. There is existing access onto Botsom Lane however this is a narrow steep rural lane suitable to serve a limited number of units only. The site lies within the AONB but is considered to be well contained within the landscape. Overall the previously developed portion of the site (Stanwell House) is considered able to accommodate development, however it is located within the Green Belt so this designation would need to change in order for it to be developed. | 2017-12-01 | 2017-11-01 | |||||||||
| BFR54 | BFR54 | yes | 0.17 | 5 | 6 | not owned by a public authority | Not Permissioned | http://cds.sevenoaks.gov.uk/mgAi.aspx?ID=8474 | POINT(0.260848 51.36389) | The site is isolated and not connected to a settlement. The existing access onto Scratchers Lane could be utilised. Located close to Brands Hatch race circuit concerns are raised regarding potential noise issues. Overall the site is considered able to accommodate development however it is located within the Green Belt so this designation would need to change in order for it to be developed. | 2017-12-01 | 2017-11-01 | |||||||||
| BFR55 | BFR55 | yes | 1.24 | 37 | 49 | not owned by a public authority | Not Permissioned | http://cds.sevenoaks.gov.uk/mgAi.aspx?ID=8475 | POINT(0.120207 51.315944) | The site is located adjacent to Knockholt urban confines. The existing access onto Main Road could be utilised if improved. Given the close proximity of the site to existing residential units there are some concerns over amenity impacts which could be addressed through high quality design. Overall the site is considered able to accommodate development however it is located within the Green Belt so this designation would need to change in order for it to be developed. | 2017-12-01 | 2017-11-01 | |||||||||
| BFR57 | BFR57 | yes | 2 | 60 | 80 | not owned by a public authority | Not Permissioned | http://cds.sevenoaks.gov.uk/mgAi.aspx?ID=8477 | POINT(0.129272 51.324854) | Partially located within Halstead urban confines the site is considered sustainable. The existing access onto Knockholt Road could be utilised. Development in the southern part of the site would create an unnatural extension to the settlement. Overall the northern portion of the site is considered able to accommodate development however it is located within the Green Belt so this designation would need to change in order for it to be developed. | 2017-12-01 | 2017-11-01 | |||||||||
| BFR58 | BFR58 | yes | 0.63 | 18 | 25 | not owned by a public authority | Not Permissioned | http://cds.sevenoaks.gov.uk/mgAi.aspx?ID=8478 | POINT(0.311958 51.370915) | The site is located adjacent to New Ash Green urban confines. The existing access onto Church Street could be utilised however this is a narrow rural lane and considered suitable for a limited number of units only. Overall the site is considered able to accommodate development, however it is located in the Green Belt so this designation would need to change in order for it to be developed. | 2017-12-01 | 2017-11-01 | |||||||||
| BFR59 | BFR59 | yes | 0.93 | 27 | 37 | not owned by a public authority | Not Permissioned | http://cds.sevenoaks.gov.uk/mgAi.aspx?ID=8479 | POINT(0.301512 51.380375) | The site is located adjacent to the urban confines of Hartley which has adequate facilities/services and transport links. The existing access onto Ash Road could be utilised for the eastern parcel but it is not possible to see how access could be achieved to the western parcel without third party involvement. Overall the eastern parcel is considered able to accommodate development, however it is located in the Green Belt so this designation would need to change in order for it to be developed. | 2017-12-01 | 2017-11-01 | |||||||||
| BFR60 | BFR60 | 0 | 0 | not owned by a public authority | Not Permissioned | http://cds.sevenoaks.gov.uk/mgAi.aspx?ID=8480 | POINT(0.300468 51.385629) | The site is located adjacent to the urban confines of Hartley. The existing access onto Castle Hill could be utilised however Castle Hill is a narrow single track lane and not considered suitable for this scale of development. Overall the site is considered unsuitable for development given the inadequate access and encroachment into the countryside. | 2017-12-01 | 2017-11-01 |
Showing rows 101 to 150 of 187